Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents
Indoor and Built Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lange, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Emergence of a New Policy for Asbestos: A Result of the World Trade Center Tragedy

John H. Lange

Envirosafe Training and Consultants, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Modern day risks from asbestos, especially in environmental settings, have been questioned. The concerns associated with stringent regulation of asbestos are mostly no longer voiced in regulatory communities. As a result of the World Trade Center (WTC) event in 2001, issues relating to the actual risks of asbestos in building materials have re-surfaced. Regulatory agencies, through their policy statements, have downplayed the risks associated with the WTC event of asbestos in debris and dust which covered the surrounding area. These statements now question past practices and requirements associated with asbestos as mandated by these same agencies. It is suggested that such statements by asbestos regulatory agencies will reduce and lower the current regulatory requirements, and change the direction of regulatory policy. This paper discusses risks from asbestos and the possible future direction of regulatory standards for these minerals in the United States. Future risks from ‘‘hazardous’’ materials, it is suggested, should be based on actual scientific facts, with less influence from social and political factors.

Key Words: Environmental regulations • Occupational regulations • OSHA • EPA • Precautionary principle • Legislating science

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 13, No. 1, 21-33 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X04038959
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?