Indoor and Built Environment

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register and gain free access

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ilgren, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 13, No. 5, 375-382 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X04047764

Coalinga Chrysotile: A Short-Fibre, Amphibole-Free, Chrysotile: Part VI - Additional Evidence for Lack of Fibrogenicity

E. B. Ilgren

Bryn Mawr, Penna, dredilgren{at}aol.com

This report describes additional unpublished data that support the notion that Coalinga chrysotile is not fibrogenic. These data are from the same long-term, NTP-NIEHS, chronic chrysotile inhalation study that served as the basis for our earlier publications which concluded that Coalinga chrysotile was not fibrogenic due to its lack of biopersistence. Wagner-scored 12 and 24 month interim sacrifice data from the NTP-NIEHS investigation and an unpublished data set from the comparison MRC study both previously unreported, were recently found in the author’s files. The histology slides and attendant data should have been amongst the materials archived at the NTP but were not present at the time the author reviewed those files in 1995 and 1996. Review of these new materials showed that Coalinga chrysotile did not produce fibrosis either at 12 or 24 months in contrast to the two Canadian preparations which were both fibrogenic even at this early stage of the study. These new data and related testimony greatly strengthen our earlier conclusions and serve to refute earlier apparently contradictory reports. International and Governmental Reports support the conclusion reached in our papers that Coalinga chrysotile is not pathogenic. In fact, the only scientists to criticise our conclusions have been in litigation against Union Carbide.

Key Words: Coalinga • Chrysotile • Fibrogenicity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?