Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Indoor and Built Environment
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makison, C.
Right arrow Articles by Swan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effect of Humidity on the Survival of MRSA on Hard Surfaces

C. Makison

J. Swan

Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire, SK17 9JN

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) is an ongoing clinical problem world-wide and a recognised cause of nosocomial infection. In the UK it has been reported that approximately 100,000 patients acquire nosocomial infections per annum, of which 6000 die [1]. If MRSA survives for long periods in health-care environments, this may contribute to infection transmission from fomites.

We evaluated the effect of humidity on the survival of MRSA on five different hard surfaces commonly found in health-care establishments. Adjusting the humidity of such environments may provide an inexpensive way of reducing MRSA prevalence. Tiles (1cm2) of five surface types including wood and Formica were inoculated with 5 105–5 106 ATCC EMRSA15 cells suspended in PBS with 1% BSA. EMRSA15 was chosen as it is the most common of two prevalent strains in UK hospitals. Multiple samples of each surface type were then incubated at 42%, 52% and 65% relative humidity (RH) at 23°C (room temperature). Cells from samples of each surface type were re-suspended; agar plates were inoculated and incubated overnight at 37°C and the number of colonies counted. Samples were taken every day for the first week, twice weekly for the following 2 weeks and once a week thereafter. Numbers of viable cells decreased over time from 5105–5106 at day one to below 2 104 by day 22. Minor differences in the rate of decline occurred with different humidities and surface types, generally showing a steep decline in numbers in the first 10 days and a slower decline thereafter. After 57 days numbers were less than 600 but some still persisted.

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 15, No. 1, 85-91 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X06062582


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?