This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gül, H. Articles by Güngör, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Occupational and Environmental Risk Factors for the Sick Building Syndrome in Modern Offices in Istanbul: A Cross Sectional Study

Department of Public Health, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, hulyagul{at}istanbul.edu.tr

Halim Isever

Department of Public Health, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University

Özkan Ayraz

Department of Public Health, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University

Günay Güngör

Department of Public Health, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University

In this study we aimed to research the frequency of and possible risk factors for sick building syndrome (SBS) in indoor workplaces in Istanbul. The investigation was carried out in 50 non-governmental bank offices: 25 had a central ventilation system (the study group) and 25 a local ventilation system (the control group). Clinical outcomes were estimated by a standardised questionnaire completed by employees. In addition, the level of indoor gaseous pollutants and bio-aerosols (micro-fungi and bacteria) were measured. The most prevalent bio-aerosols found in the study offices were high densities of Penicillium and Aspergillus spores in contrast to the control offices where the predominant species were Cladasporium and Alternia spores. Findings of SBS were relatively increased in those working in buildings with a central air conditioning system (OR=1.68; 95% CI: 1.04-2.70); in those working for less than 3 years in the building (OR=1.91; 95% CI: 1.18-3.09); in those operating a photocopier frequently (OR=1.70; 95% CI: 1.15-2.53); in women (OR=1.78; 95% CI: 1.21-2.63) and in those with workplace dissatisfaction (OR=2.06; 95% CI: 1.40-3.05).

Key Words: Indoor air quality (IAQ) • Sick building syndrome (SBS) • Occupational health • Work environment • Istanbul-Turkey • Fungi

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 16, No. 1, 47-54 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X06074502


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?