Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Indoor and Built Environment
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Zhai, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Identification of Appropriate CFD Models for Simulating Aerosol Particle and Droplet Indoor Transport

Xiang Liu

Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0428, USA

Zhiqiang Zhai

Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0428, USA, John.Zhai{at}colorado.edu

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely used to predict indoor particle and droplet transport and dispersion. CFD solves simplified conservative equations that describe the major characteristics of particle and droplet indoor movement, along with the flow governing equations. This paper reviews the principles of three prevalent CFD models for indoor particle and droplet simulation: the lazy particle model, isothermal particle model and vaporizing droplet model, with a focus on the disparities between these models. The study verifies that different particle and droplet models provide distinct simulation results in which size of particle and droplet is a critical factor. To justify proper application of these models for particles and droplets with different sizes, the paper theoretically analyzes the Lagrangian transport equations for particle and droplet and identifies two crucial time numbers — particle momentum response time and evaporation lifetime. Upon these numbers, two new indices have been introduced — Stokes number and evaporation effectiveness number, which can be used as simple criteria to guide the model selection. The case studies confirm the value of the indices and provide the rules of thumb for determining appropriate CFD models for particle and droplet indoor transport under typical room conditions.

Key Words: Computational fluid dynamics • Particle • Droplet • Indoor transport simulation

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 16, No. 4, 322-330 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X06079890


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?