This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hui, P.S. Articles by Mui, K.W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Using Carbon Dioxide Concentration to Assess Indoor Air Quality in Offices

Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

L.T. Wong

Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

K.W. Mui

Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, behorace{at}polyu.edu.hk

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentration is commonly used as a surrogate indicator for assessing indoor air quality (IAQ) and ventilation efficiency. The measurement and analysis of average indoor CO₂ concentration is useful to understand the performance of a ventilation system. However, uncertainties due to the ventilation rate effectiveness as well as the initial state, build-up, fluctuation, and decay of indoor CO₂ concentration from occupant load variation have not been addressed in many measurements; considerable measurement efforts are obligatory. This study, taking the long-term CO₂ measurement and occupant profile of a typical open-plan office building as reference, has developed a database to examine the probable errors of an alternative sampling scheme for assessing indoor CO₂ level in which the average pollutant concentration is obtained from two short sampling periods in two sampling sessions when the building is occupied. The results show that the assessed CO₂ level deviates from the long-term average and the probable errors correlate with the required measurement time and occupant load profile. At certain confidence levels, the potential reductions in measurement time of the alternative scheme, as compared with an 8-h continuous one, will be up to 30%, some 20% less than the reduction of measurement time for assessing indoor radon level.

Key Words: Offices • Indoor air quality (IAQ) • Carbon dioxide (CO2) sampling • Occupant load

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 17, No. 3, 213-219 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X08091773


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?