This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Xiaolei Gao Articles by Leung, G. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ventilation Control of Indoor Transmission of Airborne Diseases in an Urban Community

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China

Yuguo Li

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China, liyg{at}hku.hk

Gabriel M. Leung

Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China

Following the recent severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemics and worldwide concern about the next pandemic, whether influenza or multiple drug resistant tuberculosis, has underlined the importance of effective interventions into airborne disease transmission in indoor environments in a community. The engineering control measures available include ventilation dilution, use of high-efficiency particulate air filters in a room or in the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) system, and use of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation devices in ceiling area of a room or in the HVAC system. These methods are known to be effective in controlling or delaying airborne disease transmission in a single enclosure in both healthcare facilities and the community. However, there have been no studies of their relative effectiveness at the community level. This paper presents mathematical modeling of some engineering control strategies with a focus on ventilation and corresponding analysis of their relative effectiveness compared with other public health interventions in disease control in indoor environments at the community level. The results should help us to determine the most effective intervention strategies. We conclude that the engineering intervention methods such as building ventilation can be as effective as public health interventions and the ventilation rates specified in the existing standards such as ASHRAE 62 may be too low for the purpose of preventing or controlling airborne infectious diseases in indoor environments.

Key Words: Airborne disease • Engineering control • Ventilation • Wells—Riley equation • SEIR model • Influenza

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 18, No. 3, 205-218 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X09104141


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?