This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lavoie, J. Articles by Comtois, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Microbial Decontamination of Ventilation Systems

Institut de Recherche en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail

Paul Comtois

Groupe de recherches aérobiologiques de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Qué., Canada

The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has issued a number of recommendations aimed at preventing abnormally high levels of bioaerosols. These include the elimination of stagnant water, microbial substrates, and microbial growth centres in ventilation systems, and the implementation of effective maintenance programmes. Disinfection tech niques (e.g., HEPA vacuuming, hypochlorite disinfection, and steam cleaning) are capable of eliminating microbial substrates and growth centres from ducts and other contaminated surfaces, but there is no information in the scientific literature on the optimum frequency of these operations. This study evaluated a number of corrective measures aimed at reducing aeromicrobial flora (bacte ria and saprophytic moulds). Samples of inside and outside air were taken at a laundry serving 30 hospitals. The outside air and that from 3 ventilation sys tems was sampled using a Burkard (Jet Spore) sampler, while an Andersen N-6 sampler was used to gather air samples at 6 workstations. Four 1-day sampling surveys were performed; in each case, samples were taken at least twice a day. In the first survey, carried out in June 1988, the contamination of outside air was found to differ significantly (p 0.05) from that of the air at some of the workstations, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The same workstations were re-evaluated in December 1988, 2 months after the ventilation system had been disinfected with hypochlorites and the operating conditions modi fied. No significant differences, either qualitative or quantitative, were observed between inside and outside air. The third sampling survey was undertaken in September 1989, 2 weeks after a specialized firm had per formed a complete disinfection of the system and ducts (HEPA vacuuming, steam cleaning, and disinfection with dilute hypochlorites). Visual inspection of the workplace and the ventilation system, now operating under normal con ditions, was also performed, in keeping with ACGIH recommendations. No significant difference was observed between inside and outside air. A 4th sur vey was conducted 8 months later, in May 1990, to verify the frequency of maintenance operations. Again, no significant differences were observed between inside and outside air. Ventilation systems should be disinfected before use, i.e., in the spring and autumn for air-conditioning units and heat ing units, respectively. The frequency of maintenance operations should be established on the basis of visual inspection.

Key Words: Bioaerosols • Indoor/outdoor air • Bacterial counts • Mould spore counts

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?