Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Indoor and Built Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tardiff, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Communication of Risk due to Community and Workplace Petroleum Exposure

Bernard D. Goldstein

Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Piscataway, N.J.,

O. Eugene Dickason

Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, Anchorage, Alaska

Leo Morresey

Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, Anchorage, Alaska

Robert Tardiff

EA Health Sciences Group, Silver Spring, Md., USA

We report on experiences in communicating the results of the Valdez Air Health Study (VAHS), which evaluated health risks to residents of Valdez, Alaska from operation of the Valdez marine terminal of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, and in communicating the results of a subsequent study of terminal workers. The focus was the risk of leukemia due to benzene. Commu nication of the findings was primarily by the external scientists who did the study. They publicly described in Valdez the goals and design before and dur ing the study, as well as after the results were available. Key to all communica tion efforts was recognition and respect for the validity of local concerns and for the special interests of the population. A new and unique ingredient to the process was coordination with, and peer review by, a well-funded ($2.25 mil lion/year) citizens' oversight group. New information was always released first to the Valdez City Council. Basic information about cancer and risk was giv en. Comparisons with dissimilar risks were generally avoided, but information was given about other sources of benzene and the levels of benzene elsewhere. Public concern about persistent chemicals and ecological effects led to discus sion of these issues. The consultants were encouraged to present the VAHS to government scientists and at scientific meetings. Following the release of the VAHS data, concerns were raised about the benzene risk to the 300 employees at the terminal. A detailed evaluation was made of this risk which brought into contrast the different communication challenges posed by a community risk assessment aimed at reporting actual risk levels, and the workplace in which the focus is on keeping exposures below an accepted standard.

Key Words: Benzene • Risk assessment • Risk communication • Petroleum • Leukemia • Volatile organic compounds

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 3, No. 2, 96-102 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X9400300207


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?