This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Feron, V.J. Articles by Maas, C.L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Critical Appraisal of the Setting and Implementation of Occupational Exposure Limits in the Netherlands

TNO Nutrition and Food Research Institute, Division of Toxicology, Zeist

C. Hoeksema

Health Council of the Netherlands

J.H.E. Artsa

TNO Nutrition and Food Research Institute, Division of Toxicology, Zeist

P.C. Noordam

Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, The Hague, The Netherlands

C.L. Maas

Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, The Hague, The Netherlands

Since 1978 in the Netherlands occupational exposure limits, designated maxi mum accepted concentrations (MACs), have been established by a three-step procedure. In the first, purely health-based, step the Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Standards (DECOS), a committee of the Health Council of the Netherlands, establishes a health-based recommended occupational expo sure limit (HBR-OEL). In the second, feasibility, step the Subcommittee on MAC values of the Social Economic Council, an advisory body to the govern ment, evaluates the technical and/or socio-economical feasibility of the HBR- OEL and recommends an operational MAC. In the third, administrative, step the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment (MSAE) sets the MAC as a legally binding value. Key words of the three-step procedure are openness and transparency. Areas of attention are incompleteness of the toxicological data base, inconsistencies in setting standards and the absence of limit values for composite exposures. One area of concern is the incomplete implementation of MAC values, particularly in small companies. Implementation problems are mainly caused by lack of information and education of both employees and employers on the practical significance of MAC values. Indeed, imple mentation of MACs should have top priority. On the other hand, setting of standards should be a continuing activity because they are a guidance to employers, they assist workers in negotiations on working conditions and allow the government to impose (mandatory) improvements in the workplace. Indeed HBR-OELs and MACs are necessary for all parties, and more effort is needed to increase the awareness of their practical significance, particularly in small companies.

Key Words: Workplace exposure limits • Exposure limit setting • Exposure limit implementation • The Netherlands

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 3, No. 5, 260-265 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X9400300503


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?