This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sugita, M. Articles by Kanamori, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Recalculation of Summarised Odds Ratios for the Relationship between Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer Based on Data in the EPA Report

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Takashi Izuno

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Masao Kanamori

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

We have recalculated the summarised odds ratios, with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs), for the relationship between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and lung cancer based on the odds ratios for the individual epidemiological studies given in the Environmen tal Protection Agency Report in 1992. Using DerSimonian's method, the summarised odds ratio, with 95% CI, for all the studies combined was estimated as 1.28 (1.13, 1.46). This method was used as the odds ratios for the individual studies indicated heterogeneity. This heterogeneity may arise because of differences in factors such as socio-economic status, hous ing or occupational environment among the countries where the epidemiological studies were carried out. If so, the summarised odds ratio for all the studies combined may not be an important parameter. Using Sugita's method, which enables us to eliminate publication bias indirectly, the summarised odds ratio, with 95% CI, for the 11 studies in the USA was estimated as 1.11 (0.97, 1.28). Without eliminating publication bias, the value was 1.19(1.01, 1.38). Including odds ratios from two new studies, the summarised odds ratio for the USA was found to be nearly equal to the value with publication bias eliminated. The odds ratios, with 95% CIs, summarised above do not demonstrate whether or not ETS is a significant risk factor for lung cancer. The association between ETS and lung cancer is certainly weak.

Key Words: Environmental tobacco smoke • Lung cancer • Epidemiological study • Summarised odds ratio • Meta-analysis

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 4, No. 3-4, 177-181 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X9500400308


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?