This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jones, R. N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Pleural Plaques: Diagnostic Problems and Significance

Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La., USA

Hyaline plaques of the parietal pleura are diagnosed by inspection. They are detectable at autopsy, thoracotomy or thoracoscopy, or on computed tomogra phy (CT) or plain radiographic studies (listed in order of decreasing sensitivi ty). Plain radiographs may miss one-half or more cases but are useful in survey work. The main confounders are localised pleural thickenings caused by rib fractures, and subpleural fat; the latter sometimes requires CT scanning to differentiate. Except in certain restricted geographic localities, plaques signify temporally remote exposures to asbestos minerals. Plaques develop after rela tively low exposures and are thus not reliable indicators of elevated risk of asbestos-attributable lung fibrosis or lung cancer. Neither do they cause symp toms, or detectable reductions of the individual's lung function. In most set tings, plaques indicate an elevated risk of mesothelioma, in comparison to the general population. In comparison to similarly exposed persons, plaques do not have any prognostic significance.

Key Words: Asbestos • Silicates • Pleural plaques • Aetiology • Diagnosis • Prognosis • Lung function

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 6, No. 2, 106-113 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X9700600209


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?