Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Indoor and Built Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, L.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Monitoring Viable Fungal and Bacterial Bioaerosol Concentrations to Identify Acceptable Levels for Common Indoor Environments

L.D. Robertson

Mycotech Biological, Inc., Jewett, Tex., USA

Little characterization of bioaerosol concentrations between 200 and 450 cfu.m-3 has been carried out to address potential concerns about indoor air quality. The present research describes measurements of indoor bioaerosol concentrations and concludes that a level of nontoxigenic and nonpathogenic organisms ≤ 300 cfu·m -3 should be typical for environments in which nor mal, nonimmunocompromised people live. With the exception of Cladospo rium, no organism should individually contribute more than 50 cfu·m-3 to the total. The author believes that levels >300 cfu·m-3 and/or not meeting the above criteria require further investigation for: a bias from prominent outdoor bioaerosol(s), inadequate air filtration, excessive indoor humidity and micro- humidity environments, and/or potential indigenous contamination source(s). This is not to say that a level of contamination > 300 cfu·m-3 represents any threshold having medical or health significance nor necessarily that it is repre sentative of an unacceptable indoor environment. Rather it is proposed as a 'reactionary threshold' to incite further investigation into the cause(s) of what, from the measurements made, is an above average viable concentration for indoor bioaerosols. It is also concluded that outdoor sampling should only be carried out for comparisons with individual indoor components and that indoor/outdoor ratios involving total cfu·m-3 concentrations should not be used for evaluating acceptable indoor bioaerosol concentrations.

Key Words: Bacteria • Bioaerosols • Fungi • Microfungi

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 6, No. 5, 295-300 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X9700600507


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?