| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
A Comparison of the Lead Particle Content of Indoor Dust before and after a Lead Paint Abatement: A New Source of Lead RecontaminationDepartment of Pathology, SUNY Health Science Center 750 East Adams St. Syracuse NY, 13210 (USA)
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y., USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y., USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y., USA
The lead particle content of floor dust in a housing unit scheduled for interior lead paint hazard removal was characterised microscopically to identify the contributing source(s) of the lead. It was hypothesised that elevated levels of lead in the dust resulted from the deterioration of the lead-based paint on the indoor surfaces. The question of lead particle source attribution was addressed using a combination of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dis persive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). SEM/EDS provided data on the size, shape, and composition of the individual lead-containing dust particles. The floor dusts which were analysed contained a variety of lead particle types and eight of these types from several rooms exhibited unique morphological and/ or chemical characteristics. These were variously classified as lead paint particles. The lead levels in the floor dusts prior to the abatement were
Key Words: Lead paint abatement Lead exposure • floor dust Electron microscopy Source attribution
Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 7, No. 1,
32-46 (1998) |
|||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
100 µg.ft-2. The floor dust lead concentrations immediately following the abatement were all less than the pre-abatement levels, but a re-sampling 2 months after the abatement found that the amount of lead in two of the rooms was approximately 3 and 4.5 times higher than the levels prior to the abate ment. SEM/EDS analysis of the floor dusts samples collected 2 months after the abatement showed that in these two rooms the constituent particulate lead differed from that in any of the pre-abatement dusts. Following attempts to identify possible sources of recontamination, it was found that this previously unidentified particulate lead was consistent in form with lead scraped from the interior of one of the radiators which had been removed from the complex some time after the abatement. Residual water spilling from the radiators dur ing the course of removal was, in all likelihood, the cause of the unexpectedly elevated dust lead levels.