Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Indoor and Built Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Right arrow Articles by Alván, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Respirable Suspended Particle Exposures for Non-Smokers in Beijing

Keith Phillips

Department of Air Quality Monitoring, Covance Laboratories Ltd., Harrogate, UK

David A. Howard

Department of Air Quality Monitoring, Covance Laboratories Ltd., Harrogate, UK

Mark C. Bentley

Department of Air Quality Monitoring, Covance Laboratories Ltd., Harrogate, UK

Gunnar Alván

Karolinska Institute, Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences and Technology, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Huddinge University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden

The study was centred in Beijing, People's Republic of China, and comprised housewives in one group, primarily for assessing exposures in the home, and office workers in a second group to assess the contribution of the workplace to overall exposure. Two hundred and fifty-three randomly selected non-smok ing subjects collected air samples near to their breathing zone by wearing per sonal monitors for 24 h. Samples collected were analysed for respirable sus pended particles (RSP), nicotine, 3-ethenylpyridine and environmental tobac co smoke (ETS) particles using ultraviolet absorbing particulate matter (UVPM), fluorescing particulate matter (FPM) and solanesol-related particu late matter (SolPM) measurements. Saliva cotinine analyses were also under taken to confirm the non-smoking status of the subjects, and a misclassifica tion rate of between 3.4 and 3.8% was estimated. RSP levels were the highest reported to date by these authors, with median 24-hour time-weighted average concentrations varying between 70 µg.m-3 for housewives living in non- smoking households and 114 µg.m -3 for office workers both living and work ing in smoking environments. High background levels of unidentified air borne fluorescing compounds in Beijing resulted in abnormally high FPM esti mates and precluded the use of this marker in the assessment of ETS exposure. The highest exposures to ETS particles (SolPM) and nicotine were estimated for office workers living and working in smoking environments. These sub jects would potentially inhale between 5 and 11 cigarette equivalents per year (CEs/y), based upon median exposures, with the workplace contributing approximately 40% of this exposure. The most highly exposed subjects in this study, based upon 90th percentile exposures, would potentially inhale between 32 and 46 CEs/y.

Key Words: Air quality • Nicotine • Solanesol • Cotinine • Cigarette equivalents • Personal monitoring

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 7, No. 5-6, 254-269 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X9800700503


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?