Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Indoor and Built Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hessel, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Methodological Issues Related to Studies of Workers in the Diatomaceous Earth Industry

Patrick A. Hessel

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) recently reviewed the human and animal evidence relat ed to the carcinogenicity of silica, finding that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that crystalline silica in the form of quartz or cristobalite is a human carcinogen. A series of studies examining mortality of workers at several facilities processing diatomaceous earth was considered by the IARC committee to have provided strong evidence favouring their decision. A number of factors raise concerns about the results of these studies. These factors include modestly elevated risk estimates, the lack of adequate smoking information, bias in the estimates of exposures to crystalline silica and asbestos, and post hoc selection of historical exposure weightings and lag periods. Most of these shortcomings typify the literature available for the previous IARC review (1987) which concluded that there was only 'limited' evidence for the carcinogenicity of silica in humans, and suggest ed that studies be undertaken in populations of workers not exposed to known carcinogens. The limitations of

Key Words: Silica • Diatomaceous earth • Lung cancer • Epidemiology • Occupational health

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 8, No. 2, 127-131 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X9900800208
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?