Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Indoor and Built Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lange, J.H.
Right arrow Articles by Sites, S.L.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Study of Area and Personal Airborne Asbestos Samples during Abatement in a Crawl Space

J.H. Lange

department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gannon University, Erie, Pa.

B.D. Kuhn

department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gannon University, Erie, Pa.

K.W. Thomulka

University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, Pa.

S.L.M. Sites

Northeastern Environmental Associates, Inc., Chambersburg, Pa., USA

Air sample data were collected during asbestos abate ment of two buildings using area and personal sampling methods. Abatement involved removal of pipe insula tion from crawl spaces. The two sampling methods were compared to determine if there was a relationship be tween them. A relationship was observed between area and personal airborne samples in building 2 as deter mined by correlation and regression but is most likely due to chance. One major outlier was detected for both area and personal measurement sample data sets in building 2. It was concluded that any relationship be tween area and personal sample measurements must be viewed with caution. Concentrations measured from personal sampling were statistically higher than those from area sampling. Also, the distributions of concentra tions in the samples were calculated to be nonnormal (logarithmic form). It is proposed that area sampling under-estimates worker exposure compared to personal measurements and is not applicable for exposure and hazard assessment. It is suggested that area and person al samples measure two different population concentra tions of airborne fibers. Use of area samples in lieu of personal measurements should only be employed with caution.

Key Words: Area sampling . Personal sampling . Occupational exposure • Asbestos abatement • Glove-bag

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 9, No. 3-4, 192-200 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X0000900308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
T P Brown and L Rushton
Mortality in the UK industrial silica sand industry: 1. Assessment of exposure to respirable crystalline silica
Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2005; 62(7): 442 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]