Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Indoor and Built Environment
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albatici, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Elements and Strategies for Sustainable Intervention in the Residential Building Sector: a Case Study

Rossano Albatici

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Trento, Trento, Italy, rossano.albatici{at}unitn.it

This paper deals with research carried out at the Laboratory of Building Design, University of Trento, Italy to define possible design actions to improve energy efficiency and indoor comfort conditions in residential buildings. The paper presents retrofitting interventions both in wintertime and summertime, through the use of passive solar elements and of natural materials typical of the local building tradition. There were five stages of research: (1) critical analysis and classification of sustainable buildings in the Italian Alpine region; (2) recording data of the temporal courses of specific indoor environmental parameters in some rooms of selected existing buildings during real life conditions; (3) setting up of a virtual model of the buildings in dynamic state conditions; (4) a critical calibration of the model in order to take into account the real behaviour of the inhabitants and their use of the building components; (5) modification of some features on the model (materials, shape and so on) in order to achieve better performances concerning users’ comfort conditions and energy saving issues. In consequence, it is now possible to evaluate the real effectiveness of bioclimatic design procedures and to propose guidelines concerning the design of sustainable wooden buildings. Finally, some specific recommendations are given based on the critical analysis of the simulation results.

Key Words: Bioclimatic • Comfort • Energy saving • Guidelines • Wooden buildings

References

  • Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on the Energy Performance of Buildings, December 16, 2002.
  • Order in Council n. 192/05, Implementation of the Directive 2002/91/EC on the Energy Performance of Buildings, August 19, 2005.
  • Order in Council BE n. 311/06, Corrective and Additional Regulations to the Order in Council August 19, 2005, n. 192, implementing the Directive 2002/91/EC on the Energy Performance of Buildings, December 29, 2006.
  • Order in Council BE n. 112/98, Assignment of Governmental Functions and Administrative Duties to Regions and Local Bodies, March 31, 1998.
  • FeistW.! Gestaltungsgrundlagen PassivhäuserDarmstadt, Germany, Verlag das Beispiel, 1996, pp. 144
  • Fanger O.: Thermal Comfort, Analysis and Application in Environment Engineering. Copenhagen, Danish Technical Press, 1970.
  • Los S., Pulitzer NF: I caratteri ambientali dell’architettura. Trento, Italy, edizioni ARCA, 1999, pp. 229
  • GivoniB.: Comfort, climate analysis and building design guidelines. Energy Buildings 1992;18(1): 11-23.[CrossRef]
  • de Dear FJ, Brager GS: Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy Buildings 2002;34(6):549-562.[CrossRef]
  • Nicol JF, Humphreys MA: Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Energy Buildings 2002;34(6): 563-572[CrossRef]
  • UNI EN ISO 7730: Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria, February 2006.

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 18, No. 5, 447-453 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X09344278


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albatici, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?